• Skip to main content
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Thinking About Theology

  • About
  • Donate
You are here: Home / Eschatology / C. S. Lewis on the Most Embarrassing Bible Verses
C. S. Lewis on the Most Embarrassing Bible Verses

C. S. Lewis on the Most Embarrassing Bible Verses

C. S. Lewis on the Most Embarrassing Bible Verses
April 28, 2025
8 Comments

Post may contain affiliate links. Read my disclosure statement.

C.S. Lewis said that the verses about Jesus returning in the lifetime of his followers are the most embarrassing verses in the Bible.

Here is the Scripture to which he’s referring. It occurs in three of the four Gospels.

Matthew 24:34, Mark 13:30, and Luke 21:32

Truly I tell you, this generation will not pass away until all these things have happened.

Here is what Lewis said as recorded here and here.

“Say what you like,” we shall be told, “the apocalyptic beliefs of the first Christians have been proved to be false. It is clear from the New Testament that they all expected the Second Coming in their own lifetime. And, worse still, they had a reason, and one which you will find very embarrassing. Their Master had told them so. He shared, and indeed created, their delusion. He said in so many words, ‘this generation shall not pass till all these things be done.’ And he was wrong. He clearly knew no more about the end of the world than anyone else.”

“It is certainly the most embarrassing verse in the Bible… …. The one exhibition of error and the one confession of ignorance grow side by side…. The facts, then, are these: that Jesus professed himself (in some sense) ignorant, and within a moment showed that he really was so.”

The World’s Last Night: And Other Essays, page 97

So this is a problem for Christians. Many atheists and Muslims will point to these verses to show that Jesus was a false prophet.

How do you respond to this:?

Do you really think Jesus was wrong? Do you believe Jesus didn’t know what He was saying?

Or is our understanding of Scripture and history incorrect?

The only eschatological view that fully addresses this question is preterism. Preterism has its own issues as well, but it is fully able to answer this criticism. The rest of the views have no solid answer for this.

Visited 27 times, 1 visit(s) today

Category: EschatologyTag: C.S. Lewis | Luke (Bible) | Mark (Bible) | Matthew (Bible) | Preterism

About Sallie Borrink

I’m a Christian, wife, homeschool mom, battle-seasoned blogger, and happy warrior for Christ. I discuss how Christians who don’t fit dominant institutional church and cultural narratives are already living truthfully and faithfully in the body of Christ.

“Now the Bereans were more noble-minded than the Thessalonians, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if these teachings were true.” Acts 17:11

You Might Also Like

Big Eva Wants Christians Dumb and Compliant

The Loss of Mature Believers in Christian Institutions

The Bible Was Written For Us, But Not To Us

Previous Post:What Is the Mark of the BeastWhat Is the Mark of the Beast?
Next Post:Joel Webbon on Ignoring Women

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Kris

    May 1, 2025 at 12:59 pm

    This is an area I am still figuring out because of your posts on these issues. I have not had the time to do that kind of digging currently. This is all very interesting and good food for thought…

    Reply
    • Sallie Borrink

      November 18, 2025 at 9:08 am

      Hi Kris,

      I’m still figuring it out, too. It’s like peeling the layers of an onion. You realize the interpretation of one thing doesn’t make sense so then you have to look at another thing. Then you realize there is a much better interpretation offered for that which then forces you to reconsider something else.

      Fortunately, every layer I’ve removed has made the entire whole make more and more sense.

      Sallie

      Reply
  2. B. Velasquez

    November 18, 2025 at 10:13 am

    Sallie, I was surprised that Mr. Lewis found issue with this passage. I seemed to intuitively understand from the context that Jesus was speaking of the generation that experiences Jacob’s trouble. Maybe I am too simplistic but I know that Jesus and the Word are infallible. If there is an error, it is human based understanding and not His person or His Word. I can lack understanding of the Word but it should not be allowed to let doubt as to His person creep in.

    Reply
    • Sallie Borrink

      November 18, 2025 at 11:02 am

      I agree that the error is human based understanding. But atheists and Muslims point out that Christians seem to miss what Jesus and the apostles were clearly saying throughout the New Testament. They were very clear about what people in that generation (THEIR generation) should expect. It’s everywhere.

      “the context that Jesus was speaking of the generation that experiences Jacob’s trouble”

      So was this a past event or future event? What is/was Jacob’s trouble?

      Reply
  3. Sallie Borrink

    November 18, 2025 at 11:03 am

    Andrew Torba discusses these passages in a series of tweets I wrote about here:

    https://sallieborrink.com/andrew-torba-tweets-on-preterism

    Reply
    • David

      November 18, 2025 at 12:17 pm

      This is a very good statement by Torba on his tweets: “This is actually why critics—like Muslims and atheists—bring up these verses when they argue against Christianity. They’ll ask, If Jesus said this stuff would happen soon, why didn’t it? If it didn’t happen, was Jesus wrong, or are Christians just reading the Bible wrong?”.

      Since we believe and know that what Christ said was not wrong, because he would never lie, then it would seem apparent that many Christians are reading the Bible wrong. I’ve been amazed at how much language in Revelation echoes a lot of Old Testament themes in a fulfillment, and the book was written before the fall of Jerusalem. I think most of us have just taken other people’s words as truth rather than look for ourselves.

      Reply
  4. Sallie Borrink

    November 18, 2025 at 12:07 pm

    This is also related. Read through the New Testament books in the order in which they were WRITTEN.

    Take note of the language used about the coming of Christ. It gets progressively more intense and indicates the fulfillment is very, very soon by the time you get to the latest books.

    https://sallieborrink.com/reading-the-new-testament-books-in-the-order-they-were-written

    Reply
  5. B. Velasquez

    November 22, 2025 at 9:35 am

    Thank you Sallie. This is the second time that reading the bible in the order that they were written has been raised. My bunny ears are up.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Sidebar

Sallie Schaaf Borrink

I’m a Christian, wife, homeschool mom, battle-seasoned blogger, and happy warrior for Christ. I discuss how Christians who don’t fit dominant institutional church and cultural narratives are already living truthfully and faithfully in the body of Christ.

“Now the Bereans were more noble-minded than the Thessalonians, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if these teachings were true.” Acts 17:11

Get new posts by email

Powered by follow.it

Popular Today

  • Being Bound By Denominational Creeds and Confessions SIMPLETheologically Trapped By Denominational Confessions…
  • My Baptist Roots Protected Me Against Calvinism SIMPLEMy Baptist Roots Protected Me Against Calvinism

Categories

  • Christian Theology Deep Dives (6)
  • Eschatology (27)
  • Institutional Church & the Body of Christ (3)
  • Israel & Jews (8)
  • Leaving Calvinism (25)
  • Reformed Patriarchy (16)
  • Women in the Body of Christ (4)

A Christian Nation

"The real object of the first amendment was not to countenance, much less to advance, Mahometanism, or Judaism, or infidelity, by prostrating Christianity; but to exclude all rivalry among christian sects, and to prevent any national ecclesiastical establishment, which should give to a hierarchy the exclusive patronage of the national government."

Joseph Story (Associate Justice of the Supreme Court), Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (1833), § 1871.

countenance: To favor; to encourage by opinion or words; To encourage; to appear in defense (Websters Dictionary 1828)

Tags

1 Corinthians (Bible) 1 Peter (Bible) 2 Chronicles (Bible) 2 Corinthians (Bible) 2 Kings (Bible) 2 Timothy (Bible) Acts (Bible) Alana Lagares Book Lists Christian Nationalism Christian Reformed Church (CRC) Church Fathers Colossians (Bible) Cyrus Scofield & Scofield Bible Dale Partridge Dispensationalism Doug Wilson Exodus (Bible) Ezekiel (Bible) Francesco Hayez (Artist) Galatians (Bible) Genesis (Bible) Hebrews (Bible) James (Bible) Jeremiah (Bible) Joel Webbon John (Bible) John MacArthur John Piper Joshua (Bible) Judeo-Christian Leviticus (Bible) Luke (Bible) Making Wise Choices Malachi (Bible) Mark (Bible) Matthew (Bible) Moscow Mood Nehemiah (Bible) Preterism Psalms (Bible) Recommended Videos Revelation (Bible) Romans (Bible) Vision Forum

Recent Comments

  • Sallie Borrink on Identifying and Working Out My Theological Framework
  • Ticia on Joel Webbon on the Husband Owning His Wife, Children, and Everything Else
  • Kris on Joel Webbon on the Husband Owning His Wife, Children, and Everything Else
  • David on Joel Webbon on the Husband Owning His Wife, Children, and Everything Else
  • Sallie Borrink on The Destructive Teachings of Lordship Salvation and the Perseverance of the Saints
  • Sallie Borrink on The Destructive Teachings of Lordship Salvation and the Perseverance of the Saints
  • Sallie Borrink on The Judeo-Christian Deception: Historical Origins and Modern Consequences

My Other Website


Archives

What Can I Help You Find Today?

Home | About | Donate | Disclaimers & Disclosures | Privacy Policy | Contact

Copyright © 2005–2026 · Thinking About Theology · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Mai Theme

 

Scroll Up