• Skip to main content
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Thinking About Theology

  • Home
  • About
  • My Doctrinal Beliefs
  • Donate
You are here: Home / Women in the Body of Christ / Follow-Up On Vision Forum Post

Follow-Up On Vision Forum Post

January 8, 2007
10 Comments

Post may contain affiliate links. Read my disclosure statement.

I mentioned when I wrote this that I was disappointed Doug Phillips and Vision Forum had not responded to the allegations that had been brought forth by numerous people. In the interest of being fair, I did want to provide a link to a statement they released recently in which they (sort of) address the situations.

I have only three things to say about this because, again, I’m not getting drawn into this controversy on my blog.

1. The only way you can find this statement is if you have a direct link to it. It is not possible to go to the Vision Forum site and navigate to this statement. When I told David that they had put up a response, he went to the site to find it and read it. It is impossible to do so. You have to have the URL or a link. While I can put myself in their shoes and understand why they would do it that way, as someone who is concerned about the seriousness of the allegations and related matters I find it very troubling that they are not being forthcoming in addressing these issues but are burying the statement in a generally inaccessible part of their website.

2. Anyone who has even a basic knowledge of Vision Forum products and relationships knows that Matt and Jennie Chancey are “loosely associated” with VF. I have no problem with that. They are free to associate with anyone they choose. What I find hard to believe is that Doug Phillips and Vision Forum would call the special website Matt Chancey put up an “Independent Investigative Report”. Independent? How is it “independent” to have someone associated with the ministry doing the investigating? Again, if they want Matt Chancey to do investigating, fine. But please at least be honest about the fact that he is hardly an independent and disinterested party.

3. Hardly anyone has blogged about this whole controversy. I’ve got my thoughts about why that is, but I’m not going there. However, thanks to Kim I discovered that Barbara Curtis at MommyLife has written an extensive post about this situation. Barbara and her husband have suffered through spiritual abuse so she has much helpful insight to offer. Her post is long, but a helpful read whether you are interested in the VF controversy or not. No one is immune from ending up in a similar situation.

Updated to add that Barbara has added a Part 2 that is also excellent.

Visited 17 times, 1 visit(s) today

Category: Women in the Body of ChristTag: Vision Forum

About Sallie Borrink

I’m a Christian, wife, homeschool mom, battle-seasoned blogger, and happy warrior for Christ. I discuss how Christians who don’t fit dominant institutional church and cultural narratives are already living truthfully and faithfully in the body of Christ.

“Now the Bereans were more noble-minded than the Thessalonians, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if these teachings were true.” Acts 17:11

You Might Also Like

The End of Woman | Carrie Gress

Mark Driscoll Says Macho Men and Dudes are the Key to the Future of the Church

The Spiritual Destruction Caused By Instagram and Influencers

Previous Post:A Clarification Regarding Vision Forum
Next Post:Keeping Your Children With You In Church

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Kim

    January 8, 2007 at 9:00 pm

    The only way you can find this statement is if you have a direct link to it.

    Huh. I had no idea. I wonder how Mr./Ms. Anonymous who posted it on my blog got it and WHO they were (!!). That just plain old stinks. I tell ya, he’s (DP) looking worse by the minute.

    Reply
  2. Joanna

    January 8, 2007 at 10:40 pm

    This was my first thought exactly-they are very close friends. Independent my eye!!

    Reply
  3. Katie B.

    January 8, 2007 at 11:35 pm

    I second that, I thought “Independent?” Come on. While there are some things I have found worthwhile out of the Vision Forum family of products/writings/etc., in general the more I read/see, the more I feel unsettled. I have found Matt Chancey’s writings to be quite hateful and angry, so I have always been completely turned off by him. The “Mrs. Binoculars” site seemed so ridiculous to me, I just couldn’t believe VF linked to it. Glad to know I’m not the only one. What I find so interesting is how many people have commented in numerous blogs regarding pre-Epstein feelings that something just isn’t right with Doug Phillips’ teachings. Why did it take a scandel like this to bring that out in the open?

    Reply
  4. Spunky

    January 9, 2007 at 11:34 am

    Sallie,

    I emailed them with the exact same two concerns as your points #1 and #2. (In separate emails). I received a personal reply when I inquired about those points. Here is why they said they buried the link in their blog when I told them I found it through another website last week,

    Thank you for your kind words and your reasonable request. Vision Forum did send a letter and link to the people we knew who were specifically contacted regarding this issue by the anonymous hucksters behind the scheme to defame our president and his wife, our ministry, and other precious and innocent people within our community. It is not our intention to encourage those people who have not been exposed to this untruthful and unbiblical gossip to waste their time in a debate between known Christian men and women with godly reputations, and anonymous hit men. On the other hand it was important to respond to those individuals who had been contacted with the defamatory material. With respect to the link that you mentioned, we have not been in personal contact with the author of the website you referenced. However, the link and articles referenced are available to the broader public audience through the following URL: http://www.visionforum.com/about/issues/al/. As I’m sure you have noticed, these articles are hosted the Vision Forum site and available for all to review.

    I think they believe that this is just a small circle of “slanderers” who are seeking the demise of their ministry. I hope they begin to realize that there are those of us who have invested our resources into their ministry who are also concerned about the issues being raised. I want to believe the best, but as a supporter of their ministry, accountability and Truth are also important aspects to my continued support.

    And in regards to point #2 about Mr. Chancey’s independence they said,

    While each of the documents address a specific issue against the broader context of an internet campaign to slander, we retained each of our comments in one centralized area.

    They really never addressed why they called it an “independent investigation” which I felt was a disingenuous representation of the relationship between Mr. Chancey and Vision Forum. Their reply to my question was disappointing, he never answered why they called it “independent” when ANYONE who has been around knows there is a tight connection between the Phillips and Chancey’s including Mr. Chancey serving in several capacities of Persecution Project which is directed by Doug’s brother.

    I like some of the Vision Forum products and dismissed others. We have purchased quite a bit over the last six years. I won’t be buying anymore in the near future. As I said to the gentleman from Vision Forum in my reply,

    While the links provided on the Vision Forum site provide some explanation about the video, I am also watching the manner in which this is all handled. To me, “how this is handled speaks to the credibility of the organization as much as a letter of reference from the attorneys involved.”

    We are making that decision to purchase further materials NOT out of spite or malice toward the Phillips but as wise stewards of the resources we are entrusted with by our Lord. A ministry must be accountable. Doug Phillips has my support in the past (He even won my Best Homeschool Dad blog award). Dismissing the concerns and legitimate inquiries of previous customers is not prudent in business or in ministry.

    Reply
  5. Andrea

    January 9, 2007 at 2:12 pm

    Okay, maybe because I’ve dismissed VF as too crazily fundamentalist in the past is a good reason to pose these questions…

    What exactly is the issue? What is going on?? Would someone be willing to englighten me?

    I don’t understand…I’m so confused (blame it on the morning sickness!)

    Thanks!

    Andrea

    Reply
  6. judy

    January 9, 2007 at 6:34 pm

    I just received their sale flier in the mail today.

    I find this all so disturbingly sad.

    Why is it SO hard to just admit “I was wrong” and make amends?

    I thank God that I remember exactly where I was and who I was with when I realized that I could have a happy life and still admit that I was wrong. I hate to be wrong. Who doesn’t? But the freedom in Christ to be forgiven is too good to miss.

    Sadly, many ministries use incidents like this to prove to their supporters that they are ‘true’ and are just under attack by Satan.

    Reply
  7. Sallie

    January 9, 2007 at 8:20 pm

    Glad to find out I wasn’t the only one who found the “independent” thing totally unbelievable and the Mrs. Binoculars site less than praiseworthy.

    Spunky – Thanks for sharing the information you had re: your correspondance. I am in complete agreement with you that the “how this has been handled” is just as important in some ways as whether or not the allegations are true. So far I’ve seen nothing in the way this has been handled to encourage me to think anything other than the fact that the allegations probably are by and large true.

    Andrea – I made the decision not to link specifically to any of this stuff. Just do a Google search and you’ll find plenty to keep you busy.

    Judy – I received the same postcard today (even though we emailed VF a few weeks ago and asked to be removed from their mailing list).

    Reply
  8. Andrea

    January 9, 2007 at 10:12 pm

    Sallie, everyone:

    I am saddened beyond belief over what I read on the Epstein’s blog regarding Vision Forum. I am glad I followed my ‘gut’ reaction about their website from the get-go.

    One thing I feel that I’ve worked through though, is the concept of biblical womanhood. I’ve struggled for months, reading stay at home wife/mother blogs feeling guilty and like a bad wife for choosing to work (school debts just don’t disappear!), for getting a masters’ degree, etc. I’ve realized that unfortunately, Satan uses even the most seemingly holy goals to entrap and ensare us. That would be the day (and this is said with a bit of cynicism) that a man other than my husband tells me I can’t address him, speak in church, come to the communion table, etc. It only helped to cement our family’s faith in Christ, and what we feel is what God is calling us to do. Thanks for sharing this! I pray that God continues to use situations such as this to strengthen his body of believers. 🙂

    Reply
  9. Zan

    January 11, 2007 at 11:38 am

    Wow. This is getting ridiculously silly. Why would someone spend all that time and energy trying to figure out the who Mrs. Binoculars is?

    Reply
  10. Sallie Borrink

    June 11, 2023 at 2:18 pm

    This is long after the fact, but I want to include these links for future reference.

    http://www.homemakerscorner.com/doug-phillips-resignation.html

    http://www.homemakerscorner.com/doug-phillips-statmenet-of-resignation.html

    https://jensgems.wordpress.com

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Sidebar

Sallie Schaaf Borrink

I’m a Christian, wife, homeschool mom, battle-seasoned blogger, and happy warrior for Christ. I discuss how Christians who don’t fit dominant institutional church and cultural narratives are already living truthfully and faithfully in the body of Christ.

“Now the Bereans were more noble-minded than the Thessalonians, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if these teachings were true.” Acts 17:11

Get new posts by email

Powered by follow.it

Popular Today

  • cropped-TAT-favicon-square.pngDr. Robert Epstein Senate Hearing Re: Big Tech and…
  • My Continuing Thoughts On The 2008 Election SIMPLEMy Continuing Thoughts On The 2008 Election
  • Being Bound By Denominational Creeds and Confessions SIMPLETheologically Trapped By Denominational Confessions…
  • cropped-TAT-favicon-square.pngHousing Market – Is This Scary, Sad or Just…
  • Diagnosis Is In- I'm Suffering From EEF SIMPLEDiagnosis Is In: I’m Suffering From EEF
  • Joel Webbon on Men Owning Women, Everything SIMPLEJoel Webbon on the Husband Owning His Wife,…
  • Black-people-can-be-racists-Rasmussen-Polls-2It’s Okay To Be White – Scott Adams and…
  • My Baptist Roots Protected Me Against Calvinism SIMPLEMy Baptist Roots Protected Me Against Calvinism
  • cropped-TAT-favicon-square.pngDo You Want This in the USA?
  • 800px-Michelle_Obama_official_portrait_headshotWhere Is Michelle Obama?

Categories

  • A War On White People (40)
  • AQ1 (32)
  • Battle for Western Civilization (44)
  • Big Tech, MSM, and Social Media (39)
  • Christian Theology Deep Dives (58)
  • Conspiracy Theories & Weird Stories (32)
  • Covid & Vaccines (59)
  • Cultural Discernment (1)
  • Elections (57)
  • Eschatology (27)
  • Faithful Christian Living in Difficult Times (4)
  • Illegal Immigration (22)
  • Institutional Church & the Body of Christ (32)
  • Israel & Jews (40)
  • Leaving Calvinism (25)
  • Marriage (3)
  • Money, Currency & Financial (46)
  • Psychological Warfare (30)
  • Q & The Great Awakening (50)
  • Reformed Patriarchy (17)
  • Women in the Body of Christ (100)

A Christian Nation

"The real object of the first amendment was not to countenance, much less to advance, Mahometanism, or Judaism, or infidelity, by prostrating Christianity; but to exclude all rivalry among christian sects, and to prevent any national ecclesiastical establishment, which should give to a hierarchy the exclusive patronage of the national government."

Joseph Story (Associate Justice of the Supreme Court), Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (1833), § 1871.

countenance: To favor; to encourage by opinion or words; To encourage; to appear in defense (Websters Dictionary 1828)

Tags

1 Corinthians (Bible) 1 Peter (Bible) 1 Timothy (Bible) 2 Kings (Bible) Acts (Bible) Alana Lagares Anti-semitism Brunson Case Charlie & Erika Kirk Christian Nationalism Christian Reformed Church (CRC) Church Fathers Colossians (Bible) Cyrus Scofield & Scofield Bible Dispensationalism Doug Wilson Genesis (Bible) Hebrews (Bible) Jeremiah (Bible) Joel Webbon John (Bible) John MacArthur John Piper Judeo-Christian Luke (Bible) Mark (Bible) Mark Driscoll Matthew (Bible) Michigan Moscow Mood Nephilim & Fallen Angels Numbers (Bible) Pagan Christianity President Trump Preterism Recommended Videos Revelation (Bible) Romans (Bible) The Gospel Coalition The Obamas The U.S. Debt Clock Secret Window True Womanhood Blog Trump and the Vaccines Vision Forum Zionism

Recent Comments

  • Sallie Borrink on I’m Really Not Into the Postmodern Messiness
  • Sallie Borrink on I’m Really Not Into the Postmodern Messiness
  • Sallie Borrink on DataRepublican: A color revolution got exposed. Now, conservatives must hold fast to God.
  • Sallie Borrink on Identifying and Working Out My Theological Framework
  • Ticia on Joel Webbon on the Husband Owning His Wife, Children, and Everything Else
  • Sallie Borrink on Who Are the Traitors in the Trump Administration?
  • Sallie Borrink on Who Are the Traitors in the Trump Administration?

My Other Website


Archives

What Can I Help You Find Today?

Home | About | Donate | Disclaimers & Disclosures | Privacy Policy | Contact

Copyright © 2005–2026 · Thinking About Theology · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Mai Theme

 

Scroll Up